"Q" is claimed to be the earlier document by which Matthew and Luke are derived (with Mark being the other source). The problem with Q is we have no historical bases to say it existed, not a shred. It's not referenced by anyone (else?) or it's existence even hinted at in any writing of antiquity for a simple reason, It just didn't exist. The concept should have been left in the 19th century where it first started along with other half-crocked religious theories that were popping up everywhere at that time.
about Q
A Hebrew Matthew.
3.7.12
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1946
(1)
about me
(2)
Albert Mohler
(1)
andrew marin
(1)
andrew wilson
(1)
animal rights
(1)
arsenokoite
(7)
atheists
(2)
bad bloggers
(5)
bad taste
(1)
bible and homosexuality
(23)
biblical inerrancy
(4)
bigotry
(1)
blog husband
(1)
blog name
(1)
Bruce Metzger
(1)
C. Wayne Mayhall
(1)
centurion's lover
(1)
charles stanley
(1)
Christian persecution
(2)
christopher yuan
(1)
comments
(1)
david and michal
(1)
David Murray
(1)
edward dalcour
(1)
ex-gay
(7)
fag
(2)
food n' drink
(15)
francis chan
(1)
franklin graham
(5)
gay christian
(2)
GCN
(1)
hurt by the church
(2)
images
(11)
intro
(1)
James White
(4)
jesus and john
(1)
joe dallas
(1)
John Boswell
(1)
jude
(1)
Kevin DeYoung
(2)
landon schott
(1)
Late Nite Tapas
(1)
Leviticus
(7)
link dump
(16)
love
(1)
loving the sinner
(6)
lyndon unger
(1)
malakoi
(2)
marriage
(7)
matthew 19
(3)
Michael Brown
(2)
Michael Craven
(1)
music
(19)
my pentecostalism
(9)
my queer lifestyle
(1)
my testimony
(1)
N.T. Wright
(1)
nice words
(1)
Orlando
(1)
patheos
(1)
plagiarism
(1)
queer saints
(4)
quotes
(9)
Ravi Zacharias
(1)
revjph
(1)
robert gagnon
(15)
romans 1
(3)
sodom
(1)
street preachers
(1)
The Lizzies
(2)
The Narrow Gate
(1)
tim keller
(1)
Todd Friel
(2)
Trans
(3)
vids
(5)
Voddie Bauchum
(1)
why now?
(1)
No comments:
Post a Comment